Nathan Ridge

(That said, I feel like an LSP client should follow the [robustness principle](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robustness_principle) ("be conservative in what you send, be liberal in what you accept") and not exhibit a fatal...

See also a related discussion at https://github.com/clangd/clangd/discussions/1193

I'm supportive of clangd early-adopting these proposed new symbol tags. If anyone's interested in implementing this, I'm happy to provide pointers to the relevant code.

Hi @chouzz, thanks for your interest in working on this! > should I implement it for `DocumentSymbolClientCapabilities` and `DocumentSymbol` first? Sounds reasonable to me. > How do I test after...

We have our own releases of clangd-indexer and clangd-index-server in the `clangd_indexing_tools` package on our releases page, e.g. https://github.com/clangd/clangd/releases/tag/18.1.3. I don't think anyone has proposed adding them to the llvm-project...

Note that currently, even the background index isn't loaded on clangd startup, it's loaded the first time a source file in the directory tree of the `compile_commands.json` file (which determines...

> We make an index on a dedicated machine to be used later by many users. The 'working directory' of that machine is different than the one of the user....

> as far as I see, this is the only way that we can make this mapping happen I looked around a bit to try to figure out what is...

> Am I correct that if Spec.MountPoint would be filled in here, we would expect it to work? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/f4be6812e203690073280b9ac8d60092d75bbdce/clang-tools-extra/clangd/tool/ClangdMain.cpp#L679 I don't expect setting `Spec.MountPoint` there to have any effect. As...

> but it should work and factly works in **clang-1103.0.32.59** Can you clarify where you got this clang version from? The recent clang versions that I'm aware of have version...