future.batchtools
future.batchtools copied to clipboard
:rocket: R package future.batchtools: A Future API for Parallel and Distributed Processing using batchtools
I'm using `future.batchtools` via `drake`, and just got my first plan running on the cluster. It seems to take about one minute for each job submitted, and since I'm trying...
**Describe the bug** When used with promises package, future.batchtools complains about a missing option "background" to `nbrOfWorkers()` and secondly about a missing function `nbrOfFreeWorkers()` **Error Message** `Unhandled promise error: nbrOfFreeWorkers()...
After a lot of troubleshooting I've submiited a related bug report/feature request [here](https://github.com/mllg/batchtools/issues/273#issue-903023047) at batchtools. Long story short, jobs submitted via future.batchtools are timing out in readLog, even though the...
Implement `nbrOfFreeWorkers()` for batchtools future. This requires future (>= 1.21.0).
# Issue Argument `workers` is not respected by `future()` - only `future_lapply()`. # Action * [ ] Add internal future registry, cf. future.callr. * [ ] Add package tests, if...
# Issue There is no standard for how **batchtools** resources are used in the batchtools templates. This means that we all have slightly different templates and ways to declare the...
```sh $ cat inst/templates/sge.tmpl ## Shell: #$ -S /bin/bash # Run this as a bash script (required) ## Job name: #$ -N ## Merge standard error and output: #$ -j...
I am trying to run the example code in the future.batchtools Git Hub README, as follows. But I failed due to error message shown below. Could you help me out?...
I have submitted a simple pull request for a [bugfix](https://github.com/mllg/batchtools/pull/276#issue-696300102) in `batchtools` which fuelled some of its behaviour mentioned in #73. I'm writing here because this proposed bugfix reveals an...