Google Code Exporter
Google Code Exporter
``` Add //: for QtLinguist, in order to add informations for the translator ``` Original issue reported on code.google.com by `[email protected]` on 9 Dec 2013 at 10:52 Attachments: - [cpplint.py.patch](https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-attachments/google-styleguide/issue-21/comment-0/cpplint.py.patch)
``` The following warning is wrong: https://code.google.com/p/google-styleguide/source/browse/trunk/shell.xml?r=112# 716 [[ "${my_var}" ]] is, when quoted, always exactly the same as [[ -n "${my_var}" ]] regardless of my_var contents, as far I've...
``` Allows cpplint to run in Python 3. I'm don't know why the sys.stderr StreamReaderWriter wrapper doesn't work on Python 3 ``` Original issue reported on code.google.com by `[email protected]` on...
``` "as it not supported" -> "as it is not supported" ``` Original issue reported on code.google.com by `[email protected]` on 24 Aug 2013 at 12:29 Attachments: - [javascriptguide.xml.patch](https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-attachments/google-styleguide/issue-18/comment-0/javascriptguide.xml.patch)
``` Allow end-of-namespace lines that begin with whitespace. Without this change, indented end-of-namespace lines (mostly due to nested namespaces) would still cause an error even if the appropriate change is...
``` removed default bool false expressions: '0', [] and {} do evaluate as false ``` Original issue reported on code.google.com by `[email protected]` on 21 Feb 2013 at 10:11 Attachments: -...
``` Hi, First of all thank you for this great script. Let me introduce myself, my name is Jorge Costa and im am one of the developers that is currently...
``` What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Install Python 3.3 on Windows XP platform 2. Execute cpplint_unittest.py 3. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? Expected...
``` What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. https://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/lispguide.xml?showone=Attenti on_Required#Attention_Required 2. 3. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? I would expect the "Google Common Lisp Style...
``` Removed "unless resultOfOperation() is NaN". By the Abstract Equality Comparison Algorithm (ECMA-262, section 11.9.3, 1.c.i), the assertion "NaN == resultOfOperation()" is *always* false, even if resultOfOperation is NaN. Quick...