Google Code Exporter
Google Code Exporter
``` There are no need in generics, because bsh is dynamic. Generics only useful for static type checking. ``` Original comment by `[email protected]` on 5 May 2011 at 1:40
``` Even if this is perfectly valid it would be helpful is generics syntax would be accepted by the parser so that you can switch between bsh and java (e.g....
``` Yes, I would be perfect if bsh parser accept a generics syntax! 1. Modern Java code have tons of generics and enums. To run that code under bsh -...
``` Perhaps we could explicity state that generics are not checked like e.g. by javac. So you could create and use code in bsh2 which is no valid java code...
``` To keep this up-to-date: Parsing of generics was added with r30 and r31. ``` Original comment by `[email protected]` on 16 Nov 2011 at 9:38
``` Any chance of getting enum support any time soon? ``` Original comment by `[email protected]` on 22 Nov 2011 at 1:55
``` @jpsutton Which kind of "support" do you mean? Defining enums from beanshell? ``` Original comment by `[email protected]` on 22 Nov 2011 at 2:08
``` Yes. However, I just now saw your previous comment where you stated that it would require a major re-write. Question answered. :) ``` Original comment by `[email protected]` on 23...
``` Hi Regarding generics support, I've found that entering the following command works fine: Vector v = new Vector(); but as soon as I have more that one templated class,...
``` ReHallo I want to recall the second part of my previous post, because after some very heavy digging I found what I was looking for and I even was...