Matus Goljer
Matus Goljer
Can you give some more information: what mode, what sp version, what emacs version.
This seems to be an emacs 26 issue. I guess they changed the syntax tables once again :/ I'll try to get some tests running on that and see what's...
Confirmed to be a problem on 25.1
This is really stupid on my part. There are *two* escaping features both of which kind of do the same but not. It is really confusing. The option you refer...
@ZzAntares that seems like a different issue because for me it does what you describe. Try setting `(setq sp-autoskip-closing-pair (quote always))`
You can call `sp-backward-up-sexp` to reformat the sexp to kill any extra whitespace. Slurping itself doesn't do this but it can be implemented with a post-slurp hook. I think it...
This is not a high priority for me currently because I never slurp into empty forms, I prefer to use wrapping which is faster. If anyone wants to provide a...
Hm, this is _ugly hack^TM_ but you could `defvar` a variable for ruby mode to save the state in pre-handler and then use it in post-handler (and then erase it)....
Should be simple enough to repurpose `sp--unwrap-sexp` to take optional opening/closing replacement---right now it only deletes the regions occupied by the delimiters. I'm thinking what would be a good way...
What about other types of parens as @dgtized mentioned? I think I'll make it a pair property where you can specify a cons of beg/end replacements... with some special form...