FlyingSamson
FlyingSamson
Thank you for gathering all that information. > The conclusion I must reach is that I have no idea how the developer intent for their software to be packaged. I...
> suggesting the port shouldn't even have a dependency on protobuf3-cpp anymore Indeed, the `protobuf3-cpp` port alone is sufficient to "compile" proto files into python specific code, while the `py-protobuf3`...
Could we maybe also use the protoc version (aka. the minor version that is kept constant across languages) instead of the major version (currently 3) to name the ports? My...
Implemented in #649.
Should we also address the issue described in [ticket 69975](https://trac.macports.org/ticket/69975) in this PR?
> Doesn't this PR already exactly address that ticket? and the commit message should therefore say that it closes that ticket? Sorry, I somehow seem to have thought that there...
I now included the two trac tickets that are addressed by this pull request in the commit message.
I’m sorry, but I am not sure what you are referring to when you say > You claimed something failed and I gave a suggestion to look into, not to...
I finally managed to get a virtual machine up and running with macOS 10.12 and Xcode 9.2, as described in the trac ticket. Testing in that image I found, that...
Thank you @Gcenx for taking the time to review my changes!