Famlam

I can confirm this, unfortunately, for multiple regions in NL

> Meanwhile, the issue number is on a good trending > https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issues/graph.png?item=1210&class=2 > and tertiary may be enabled. I would agree to just enable it, I do fear a bit...

> Than bad mapping anyway. Not in construction part should not be open to traffic. I think it's ok if the construction only starts midway the highway, but indeed, https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/nl/map/#item=1210&zoom=17&lat=52.151048&lon=4.436872&issue_uuid=81190390-7f36-91b1-8964-53373ae67f3f&level=1...

Correct, what I would propose is to allow highways to have a dead-end into a construction way. (That's a large amount of the current reports in my area and seems...

Ran the analyser with `level

Thank you for this offer! I'll send the email :) I am however already concerned about that low-populated area (Sweden Gotland), as I don't know how to evaluate the validity...

Haven't received a response on the email yet, but I don't think I'll be able to convince myself sufficiently after seeing the Sweden one, so I'm closing this request of...

Also note the current analyser only works if `ref` is _not_ present yet. If `ref` and `name` are both present, also if they are equal, it won't trigger: https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend/blob/04650f32df603c1fcd515b47e9e40dcbf8a8c3be/plugins/TagRemove_NameIsRef_FR.py#L47-L48 (But...

A large amount of these is already present in http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/nl/issues/open?item=9002 (i.e. via the JOSM validator rules). ``` aerialway=yes amenity=yes barrier=yes craft=yes landuse=yes leisure=yes manhole=yes place=yes playground=yes police=yes service=yes sidewalk=yes shop=yes...

> @dfaure @Famlam @jocelynj need help on this. > With @jocelynj we have done review of last changes and update is not required, does it ? I would agree that...