Fix/12005: Settings navigation modal leaves empty space at the bottom
Details
On Safari Desktop - the settings sidebar modal leaves an empty space at the bottom when the browser window's height changes. Refactoring the Sidebar's height from 100% to 100vh would trigger Safari to re-paint the layout as needed.
Fixed Issues
$ https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/12005
PROPOSAL: https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/12005#issuecomment-1299667696
UPDATES IN PROPOSAL: https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/12005#issuecomment-1304547544
Tests
-
Test on Safari Desktop Browser
- Open the Settings tab on Safari Desktop Browser (http://localhost:8080/settings)
- Resize the browser window by increasing the height.
- Verify that the Setting's sidebar is leaving no blank space at the bottom.
-
Test on Safari Mobile Browser
- Open the Settings tab on Safari Mobile Browser possibly on iOS Emulator (http://localhost:8080/settings)
- Verify that the Setting's sidebar is leaving no blank space at the bottom.
- Verify that the Setting's sidebar is scrollable and last item in Sidebar is visible when scrolled.
- [x] Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
QA Steps
-
Test on Safari Desktop Browser
- Open the Settings tab (https://new.expensify.com/settings) on Safari Desktop Browser
- Resize the browser window by increasing the height.
- Verify that the Setting's sidebar is leaving no blank space at the bottom.
-
Test on Safari Mobile Browser
- Open the Settings tab (https://new.expensify.com/settings) on Safari Mobile Browser
- Verify that the Setting's sidebar is leaving no blank space at the bottom.
- Verify that the Setting's sidebar is scrollable and last item in the Sidebar is visible when scrolled.
- [x] Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
PR Author Checklist
- [x] I linked the correct issue in the
### Fixed Issuessection above - [x] I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
- [x] I added steps for local testing in the
Testssection - [x] I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the
QA stepssection - [x] I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- [x] I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- [x] I added steps for local testing in the
- [x] I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
- [x] I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
- [x] iOS / native
- [x] Android / native
- [x] iOS / Safari
- [x] Android / Chrome
- [x] MacOS / Chrome
- [x] MacOS / Desktop
- [x] I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
- [x] I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
- [x] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
toggleReportand notonIconClick) - [x] I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- [x] I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- [x] I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all
src/languages/*files - [x] I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the
Waiting for Copylabel for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy. - [x] I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- [x] I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in
STYLE.md) were followed
- [x] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
- [x] If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
- [x] I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
- [x] I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like
Avatar, I verified the components usingAvatarare working as expected) - [x] I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
- [x] I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
- [x] If a new component is created I verified that:
- [x] A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- [x] All props are defined accurately and each prop has a
/** comment above it */ - [x] The file is named correctly
- [x] The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- [x] The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- [x] For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to
thisproperly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. foronClick={this.submit}the methodthis.submitshould be bound tothisin the constructor) - [x] Any internal methods bound to
thisare necessary to be bound (i.e. avoidthis.submit = this.submit.bind(this);ifthis.submitis never passed to a component event handler likeonClick) - [x] All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- [x] The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
- [x] If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- [x] A similar style doesn't already exist
- [x] The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e.
StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
- [x] If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like
Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases) - [x] If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
- [x] I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.
PR Reviewer Checklist
The reviewer will copy/paste it into a new comment and complete it after the author checklist is completed
- [ ] I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
- [ ] I verified the correct issue is linked in the
### Fixed Issuessection above - [ ] I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- [ ] I verified the steps for local testing are in the
Testssection - [ ] I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the
QA stepssection - [ ] I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- [ ] I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- [ ] I verified the steps for local testing are in the
- [ ] I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
- [ ] I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
- [ ] I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- [ ] iOS / native
- [ ] Android / native
- [ ] iOS / Safari
- [ ] Android / Chrome
- [ ] MacOS / Chrome
- [ ] MacOS / Desktop
- [ ] If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
- [ ] I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- [ ] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
toggleReportand notonIconClick). - [ ] I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- [ ] I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- [ ] I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all
src/languages/*files - [ ] I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the
Waiting for Copylabel for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy. - [ ] I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- [ ] I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in
STYLE.md) were followed
- [ ] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
- [ ] If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
- [ ] I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
- [ ] I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like
Avatar, I verified the components usingAvatarhave been tested & I retested again) - [ ] I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
- [ ] I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
- [ ] If a new component is created I verified that:
- [ ] A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- [ ] All props are defined accurately and each prop has a
/** comment above it */ - [ ] The file is named correctly
- [ ] The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- [ ] The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- [ ] For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to
thisproperly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. foronClick={this.submit}the methodthis.submitshould be bound tothisin the constructor) - [ ] Any internal methods bound to
thisare necessary to be bound (i.e. avoidthis.submit = this.submit.bind(this);ifthis.submitis never passed to a component event handler likeonClick) - [ ] All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- [ ] The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
- [ ] If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- [ ] A similar style doesn't already exist
- [ ] The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e.
StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
- [ ] If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like
Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases) - [ ] If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
- [ ] I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.
Screenshots
Web
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11846339/200317372-9a071186-0139-4aa2-a67d-4d2865c70409.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11846339/200317414-5076d713-1864-4ecf-9849-b4de0c2acded.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11846339/200317451-31482fe5-80af-4324-8fa1-e7f2e80552de.mov
Desktop
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11846339/200317487-c0680eb6-f1d2-45e2-857f-110c13b244fd.mov
iOS
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11846339/200317545-40a86b6b-a8d6-48b1-87c2-cdc4908e15e9.mov
Android
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11846339/200383218-49fba36d-e84c-434e-8872-00138a826907.mov
CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA
recheck
i retriggered GH actions and they are passing now. @rushatgabhane, feel free to review & test when you get the chance.
Simply re-requested a review from @rushatgabhane, Not sure why it removed @chiragsalian from reviewers.
@chiragsalian looks like this was merged without the checklist test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.
Not emergency. Im unsure why GH actions was failing for author/reviewer checklist even though they look complete. I asked in open-source but still proceeding to merge so that PR is not held on it.
:hand: This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.
🚀 Deployed to staging by @chiragsalian in version: 1.2.28-0 🚀
| platform | result |
|---|---|
| 🤖 android 🤖 | success ✅ |
| 🖥 desktop 🖥 | success ✅ |
| 🍎 iOS 🍎 | failure ❌ |
| 🕸 web 🕸 | success ✅ |
🚀 Deployed to staging by @chiragsalian in version: 1.2.28-0 🚀
| platform | result |
|---|---|
| 🤖 android 🤖 | success ✅ |
| 🖥 desktop 🖥 | success ✅ |
| 🍎 iOS 🍎 | success ✅ |
| 🕸 web 🕸 | success ✅ |
🚀 Deployed to production by @roryabraham in version: 1.2.28-2 🚀
| platform | result |
|---|---|
| 🤖 android 🤖 | success ✅ |
| 🖥 desktop 🖥 | success ✅ |
| 🍎 iOS 🍎 | success ✅ |
| 🕸 web 🕸 | success ✅ |