[Question] SWEET's subclasses for Landform are very mixed

[Garybc]

Landscape and landcover are not usually thought of as subclasses of landform, but are classed as such in SWEET. https://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/SWEET/?p=classes&conceptid=http%3A%2F%2Fsweetontology.net%2FrealmLandOrographic%2FOrographic Perhaps even more confusing is listing "orographic" and "non orographic:" as subclasses.

https://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/SWEET/?p=classes&conceptid=http%3A%2F%2Fsweetontology.net%2FrealmLandform%2FLandscape&jump_to_nav=true#visualization

[lewismc]

@Garybc is this a duplication of #234 ?

[Garybc]

Lewis, These 2 issues are related but use different examples of things that need to be resolved.

Potomac, MD 240-426-0770

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 12:49 PM Lewis John McGibbney < [email protected]> wrote:

@Garybc https://github.com/Garybc is this a duplication of #234 https://github.com/ESIPFed/sweet/issues/234 ?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ESIPFed/sweet/issues/235#issuecomment-763821312, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACIMQIVH25TJ5WXZSMLYJJ3S24JRBANCNFSM4WFS3YZA .