software-layer icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
software-layer copied to clipboard

{2023.06}[2023a] SimpleITK 2.3.1

Open PetrKralCZ opened this issue 2 months ago • 4 comments

2 out of 108 required modules missing:

* ITK/5.3.0-foss-2023a (ITK-5.3.0-foss-2023a.eb)
* SimpleITK/2.3.1-foss-2023a (SimpleITK-2.3.1-foss-2023a.eb)

PetrKralCZ avatar Nov 26 '25 11:11 PetrKralCZ

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws for:arch=x86_64/amd/zen2 bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-jsc for:arch=aarch64/nvidia/grace bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-deucalion for:arch=aarch64/a64fx

boegel avatar Nov 26 '25 12:11 boegel

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software Building on: amd-zen2 Building for: x86_64/amd/zen2 Job dir: /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.11/pr_1322/108014

date job status comment
Nov 26 12:15:02 UTC 2025 submitted job id 108014 awaits release by job manager
Nov 26 12:15:12 UTC 2025 released job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Nov 26 12:20:24 UTC 2025 running job 108014 is running
Nov 26 14:14:07 UTC 2025 finished
:cry: FAILURE (click triangle for details)
Details
:white_check_mark: job output file slurm-108014.out
:white_check_mark: no message matching FATAL:
:x: found message matching ERROR:
:x: found message matching FAILED:
:x: found message matching required modules missing:
:x: no message matching No missing installations
:white_check_mark: found message matching .tar.* created!
Artefacts
eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-amd-zen2-17641661960.tar.zstsize: 133 MiB (139476459 bytes)
entries: 8175
modules under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/modules/all
ITK/5.3.0-foss-2023a.lua
software under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/software
ITK/5.3.0-foss-2023a
reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/reprod
no reprod directories in tarball
other under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2
no other files in tarball
Nov 26 14:14:07 UTC 2025 test result
:grin: SUCCESS (click triangle for details)
ReFrame Summary
[ OK ] ( 1/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default
P: perf: 447.757 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 2/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default
P: perf: 447.908 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 3/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default
P: latency: 2.84 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 4/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default
P: latency: 2.55 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default
P: latency: 6.06 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default
P: latency: 5.93 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default
P: latency: 0.73 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default
P: latency: 0.75 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default
P: bandwidth: 6372.68 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default
P: bandwidth: 6390.5 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ PASSED ] Ran 10/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 0 skipped, 0 aborted)
Details
:white_check_mark: job output file slurm-108014.out
:x: found message matching ERROR:
:white_check_mark: no message matching [\s*FAILED\s*].*Ran .* test case

eessi-bot-aws[bot] avatar Nov 26 '25 12:11 eessi-bot-aws[bot]

New job on instance eessi-bot-deucalion for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software Building on: a64fx Building for: aarch64/a64fx Job dir: /home/eessibot/new-bot/jobs/2025.11/pr_1322/704565

date job status comment
Nov 26 12:15:05 UTC 2025 submitted job id 704565 awaits release by job manager
Nov 26 12:15:57 UTC 2025 released job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Nov 26 12:17:00 UTC 2025 running job 704565 is running
Nov 26 16:28:31 UTC 2025 finished
:cry: FAILURE (click triangle for details)
Details
:white_check_mark: job output file slurm-704565.out
:white_check_mark: no message matching FATAL:
:x: found message matching ERROR:
:x: found message matching FAILED:
:x: found message matching required modules missing:
:x: no message matching No missing installations
:white_check_mark: found message matching .tar.* created!
Artefacts
eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-a64fx-17641740930.tar.zstsize: 126 MiB (132574061 bytes)
entries: 8175
modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/modules/all
ITK/5.3.0-foss-2023a.lua
software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/software
ITK/5.3.0-foss-2023a
reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/reprod
no reprod directories in tarball
other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx
no other files in tarball
Nov 26 16:28:31 UTC 2025 test result
:grin: SUCCESS (click triangle for details)
ReFrame Summary
[ SKIP ] ( 1/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) according to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed
[ SKIP ] ( 2/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) according to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed
[ SKIP ] ( 3/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) according to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed
[ SKIP ] ( 4/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) according to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed
[ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default
P: latency: 1.65 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default
P: latency: 1.7 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default
P: bandwidth: 8209.28 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default
P: bandwidth: 8311.43 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default
P: perf: 33.773 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default
P: perf: 580.161 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ PASSED ] Ran 6/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 4 skipped, 0 aborted)
Details
:white_check_mark: job output file slurm-704565.out
:x: found message matching ERROR:
:white_check_mark: no message matching [\s*FAILED\s*].*Ran .* test case

Just FYI, looking at this, seems some error in the configure step for SimpleITK...

hvelab avatar Nov 27 '25 14:11 hvelab

CMake Error at Code/BasicFilters/src/CMakeLists.txt:171 (target_link_libraries):
  Cannot specify link libraries for target "SimpleITK_ITKImageIntensity"
  which is not built by this project.


-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
``

hvelab avatar Dec 01 '25 13:12 hvelab

I think I found it, was picking Lua from compatibilty layer instead of the proper binary so the configuration was all messed up.... double checking

hvelab avatar Dec 01 '25 15:12 hvelab

bingo :) (building on top of EESSI)

== Build succeeded for 1 out of 1
== Summary:
   * [SUCCESS] SimpleITK/2.3.1-foss-2023a
== Temporary log file(s) /tmp/eb-rbh__9ck/easybuild-5c9kizip.log* have been removed.
== Temporary directory /tmp/eb-rbh__9ck has been removed.

I'll ask tomorrow in the support meeting the best way to fix this, but I assume a hook

hvelab avatar Dec 01 '25 16:12 hvelab

@hvelab Can you share how you got this working?

boegel avatar Dec 03 '25 12:12 boegel

@hvelab Can you share how you got this working?

Adding the CMake option: -DSimpleITK_LUA_EXECUTABLE=$EBROOTLUA/bin/lua

hvelab avatar Dec 03 '25 12:12 hvelab

@hvelab Can you share how you got this working?

Adding the CMake option: -DSimpleITK_LUA_EXECUTABLE=$EBROOTLUA/bin/lua

@PetrKralCZ Can you look into making this change in configopts for all recent SimpleITK easyconfigs in EasyBuild?

boegel avatar Dec 09 '25 12:12 boegel