Support for Set in addition to List and Tuple?

[proofit404]

Hi, thanks for the useful package!

Is there any technical reason behind Set support absence?

Or I'm a very first person who actually needs it?

If it's missed because no one needs it yet, and maintainers are not against it, I would like to provide pull request with such implementation. Documentation and tests included.

Hopefully, new minor release would be issued after this contribution.

Thoughts?

Regards, Artem.

[Deepwalker]

I'm not against, of course. Did not include it, because generally, when you get something from internet in json, it is definitely does not include sets, instead it has list/array, and then you check that members of this set is uniq and then call set, like t.List() & uniq & set. To check python structs, you can use t.Type(set). Not sure what is you case, I'm open to new contributions.

[proofit404]

I use trafaret as normalization library in the service layer of my application.

For example, here and there, now and then.

So, in my case it supposed to be used for:

• value is a set of elements of right type
• value could be normalized to set
• items of value could be normalized to specified type

If I understand correctly, it could be expressed already but would require a complicated expression instead of just Set.

[Deepwalker]

In this case I vote for Set trafaret.