Non-intuitive if(!'property' in object)

[DavidBruant]

!'property' in object is interpreted as (!'property') in object (=> false in object) which is not what people want the vast majority of the time. Where writing this, people want to know if a property is not present in an object (!('property' in object))

[ghost]

I could definitely see having in bind tighter than !.

[DavidBruant]

Thanks eslint http://eslint.org/docs/rules/no-unsafe-negation