[CONTINT-3776] Increase duration of TestSBOM and TestContainerImage and make sure the repodigest is there
What does this PR do?
This PR increases the duration of TestSBOM and TestContainerImage and makes sure that the repodigest is sent in the protobuf.
Motivation
Reduce test flakiness by making sure that at least a refresh has occurred
Additional Notes
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Describe how to test/QA your changes
Run e2e tests. It should reduce flakiness
/trigger-ci --variable RUN_E2E_TESTS=true
Test changes on VM
Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:
inv create-vm --pipeline-id=30295435 --os-family=ubuntu
Regression Detector
Regression Detector Results
Run ID: 6e0bda47-22ab-40f4-94d1-854adb8680db Baseline: 6c5fe04ebf61708de7ad4195d02e6914f5a63365 Comparison: b71bf9fc1b07e708ace88ce2cb13706af22f5a05
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
No significant changes in experiment optimization goals
Confidence level: 90.00% Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.
Experiments ignored for regressions
Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole | % cpu utilization | +1.11 | [-5.33, +7.55] |
Fine details of change detection per experiment
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole | % cpu utilization | +1.11 | [-5.33, +7.55] |
| ➖ | pycheck_1000_100byte_tags | % cpu utilization | +0.32 | [-4.62, +5.26] |
| ➖ | otel_to_otel_logs | ingress throughput | +0.25 | [-0.18, +0.68] |
| ➖ | idle | memory utilization | +0.09 | [+0.06, +0.13] |
| ➖ | trace_agent_msgpack | ingress throughput | +0.01 | [+0.01, +0.02] |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.20, +0.20] |
| ➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.00, +0.00] |
| ➖ | process_agent_standard_check | memory utilization | -0.02 | [-0.05, +0.02] |
| ➖ | trace_agent_json | ingress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.07, +0.03] |
| ➖ | process_agent_real_time_mode | memory utilization | -0.04 | [-0.07, -0.01] |
| ➖ | process_agent_standard_check_with_stats | memory utilization | -0.15 | [-0.18, -0.12] |
| ➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.22 | [-0.30, -0.14] |
| ➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | -0.23 | [-0.32, -0.13] |
| ➖ | basic_py_check | % cpu utilization | -1.34 | [-3.86, +1.18] |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -3.25 | [-5.98, -0.51] |
Explanation
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
[Fast Unit Tests Report]
Warning: On pipeline 30295435. The following jobs did not run any unit tests:
- tests_deb-arm64-py3
- tests_deb-x64-py3
- tests_flavor_dogstatsd_deb-x64
- tests_flavor_heroku_deb-x64
- tests_flavor_iot_deb-x64
- tests_rpm-arm64-py3
- tests_rpm-x64-py3
- tests_windows-x64
If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-developer-experience
Closed as no failure was detected since a log client fix