[EBPF-294] Add Oracle images to KMT
What does this PR do?
Adds Oracle 7.9 (x64 only), 8.9 and 9.3 to KMT.
Motivation
Bringing the KMT test images as close to Kitchen as possible for security-agent tests.
Related: https://github.com/DataDog/ami-builder/pull/159 https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/EBPF-294
Additional Notes
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Describe how to test/QA your changes
Bloop Bleep... Dogbot Here
Regression Detector Results
Run ID: 1ec375f3-8d04-43e9-a1af-7c5c788d1d91 Baseline: 4666ca6225a49fbb7fbc8a9f9bc6b23770565586 Comparison: 31c4a28d817db4cd50e5b75ab9db67f89c469661
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
Experiments with missing or malformed data
- basic_py_check
Usually, this warning means that there is no usable optimization goal data for that experiment, which could be a result of misconfiguration.
No significant changes in experiment optimization goals
Confidence level: 90.00% Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.
Experiments ignored for regressions
Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole | % cpu utilization | -0.90 | [-7.43, +5.63] |
Fine details of change detection per experiment
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +1.47 | [+1.40, +1.53] |
| ➖ | process_agent_real_time_mode | memory utilization | +0.89 | [+0.85, +0.92] |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | +0.59 | [-0.86, +2.05] |
| ➖ | process_agent_standard_check | memory utilization | +0.33 | [+0.30, +0.37] |
| ➖ | idle | memory utilization | +0.10 | [+0.06, +0.13] |
| ➖ | trace_agent_msgpack | ingress throughput | +0.03 | [+0.02, +0.04] |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.00, +0.00] |
| ➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.00, +0.00] |
| ➖ | trace_agent_json | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.04, +0.02] |
| ➖ | process_agent_standard_check_with_stats | memory utilization | -0.01 | [-0.04, +0.02] |
| ➖ | otel_to_otel_logs | ingress throughput | -0.34 | [-1.00, +0.32] |
| ➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | -0.67 | [-0.75, -0.58] |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole | % cpu utilization | -0.90 | [-7.43, +5.63] |
Explanation
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
/trigger-ci --variable RUN_ALL_BUILDS=true --variable RUN_KITCHEN_TESTS=true --variable RUN_E2E_TESTS=on --variable RUN_UNIT_TESTS=on
/trigger-ci --variable RUN_ALL_BUILDS=true --variable RUN_KITCHEN_TESTS=true --variable RUN_E2E_TESTS=on --variable RUN_UNIT_TESTS=on
/trigger-ci --watch
:steam_locomotive: Devflow: /trigger-ci --watch
Test changes on VM
Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:
inv create-vm --pipeline-id=30469507 --os-family=ubuntu
Regression Detector
Regression Detector Results
Run ID: 45aad430-5a09-409c-9741-1b2490831b32 Baseline: 6e0f9feefe1686ae5979deef6d5c8edfd792c6ae Comparison: 5fc661c56d1b851f26314d30a38ebbacb9db63ec
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
No significant changes in experiment optimization goals
Confidence level: 90.00% Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.
Experiments ignored for regressions
Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole | % cpu utilization | -2.57 | [-8.84, +3.70] |
Fine details of change detection per experiment
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | +0.88 | [-1.81, +3.57] |
| ➖ | pycheck_1000_100byte_tags | % cpu utilization | +0.24 | [-4.67, +5.15] |
| ➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +0.10 | [+0.01, +0.20] |
| ➖ | trace_agent_msgpack | ingress throughput | +0.03 | [+0.01, +0.05] |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.20, +0.20] |
| ➖ | trace_agent_json | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.03, +0.03] |
| ➖ | process_agent_real_time_mode | memory utilization | -0.01 | [-0.05, +0.03] |
| ➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.05, +0.01] |
| ➖ | process_agent_standard_check | memory utilization | -0.13 | [-0.17, -0.10] |
| ➖ | otel_to_otel_logs | ingress throughput | -0.21 | [-0.65, +0.23] |
| ➖ | process_agent_standard_check_with_stats | memory utilization | -0.26 | [-0.29, -0.22] |
| ➖ | basic_py_check | % cpu utilization | -0.27 | [-2.77, +2.24] |
| ➖ | idle | memory utilization | -0.33 | [-0.37, -0.29] |
| ➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.66 | [-0.75, -0.58] |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole | % cpu utilization | -2.57 | [-8.84, +3.70] |
Explanation
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
/trigger-ci
[Fast Unit Tests Report]
On pipeline 30469507 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests:
Jobs:
- tests_deb-arm64-py3
- tests_deb-x64-py3
- tests_flavor_dogstatsd_deb-x64
- tests_flavor_heroku_deb-x64
- tests_flavor_iot_deb-x64
- tests_rpm-arm64-py3
- tests_rpm-x64-py3
- tests_windows-x64
If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-developer-experience
/merge
:steam_locomotive: MergeQueue
Pull request added to the queue.
This build is going to start soon! (estimated merge in less than 28m)
Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!