[CONTINT-3558] Add e2e tests for APM origin detection
What does this PR do?
This PR adds e2e tests for origin detection on APM.
Motivation
Increase test coverage.
Additional Notes
N/A
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
N/A
Describe how to test/QA your changes
Run tests using inv new-e2e-tests.run --targets=./tests/containers --run TestKindSuite
=== RUN TestKindSuite/TestTraceTCP
=== RUN TestKindSuite/TestTraceUDP
Bloop Bleep... Dogbot Here
Regression Detector Results
Run ID: 7beef838-ee85-4b76-91ac-af28fbf4b2cb Baseline: 9898528046a1a281bb76e22ae55f5e7f963bfb01 Comparison: 0cc41ee5aafe15281360e713d3928c7ebc57dd8d
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
No significant changes in experiment optimization goals
Confidence level: 90.00% Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.
Experiments ignored for regressions
Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole | % cpu utilization | -2.06 | [-8.56, +4.44] |
Fine details of change detection per experiment
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | otel_to_otel_logs | ingress throughput | +1.31 | [+0.68, +1.93] |
| ➖ | process_agent_real_time_mode | memory utilization | +0.12 | [+0.08, +0.15] |
| ➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +0.04 | [-0.03, +0.11] |
| ➖ | process_agent_standard_check_with_stats | memory utilization | +0.04 | [+0.01, +0.07] |
| ➖ | trace_agent_json | ingress throughput | +0.03 | [+0.01, +0.06] |
| ➖ | trace_agent_msgpack | ingress throughput | +0.03 | [+0.01, +0.04] |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.00, +0.00] |
| ➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.00, +0.00] |
| ➖ | process_agent_standard_check | memory utilization | -0.03 | [-0.05, -0.00] |
| ➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.14 | [-0.19, -0.09] |
| ➖ | idle | memory utilization | -0.40 | [-0.43, -0.37] |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -0.48 | [-1.92, +0.95] |
| ➖ | basic_py_check | % cpu utilization | -0.62 | [-2.81, +1.56] |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole | % cpu utilization | -2.06 | [-8.56, +4.44] |
Explanation
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
/trigger-ci --variable RUN_ALL_BUILDS=true --variable RUN_KITCHEN_TESTS=true --variable RUN_E2E_TESTS=auto
/trigger-ci --variable RUN_ALL_BUILDS=true --variable RUN_KITCHEN_TESTS=true --variable RUN_E2E_TESTS=auto
/trigger-ci --variable RUN_E2E_TESTS=true
/merge
:steam_locomotive: MergeQueue
Pull request added to the queue.
This build is next! (estimated merge in less than 28m)
Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!