jlogstash-performance-testing
jlogstash-performance-testing copied to clipboard
DTStack
jlogstash 与 logstash 性能对比
java logstash和 ruby logstash 做一个对比(4cores 4g 虚拟机)
| app | filter | filteworkers | cpu used(avg) | data example | data numbers | time consuming（测试10次的avg） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rubylogstash | grok | 4(默认cpu核数) | 280% | apache | 1000w | 1625s |
| javalogstash | grok | 4(默认cpu核数) | 330% | apache | 1000w | 543s |
| rubylogstash | null | 4(默认cpu核数) | 200% | 字符串(test 01) | 1000w | 705s |
| javalogstash | null | 4(默认cpu核数) | 180% | 字符串(test 01) | 1000w | 170s |
| rubylogstash | json | 4(默认cpu核数) | 260% | json 字符串 | 1000w | 1504s |
| java logstash | json | 4(默认cpu核数) | 310% | json 字符串 | 1000w | 430s |
以上三种场景的处理效率，javalogstash是rubylogstash的倍数分别是2.99倍 4.15倍 3.49倍
DTStack