curriculum icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
curriculum copied to clipboard

Create a way to track code reviews

Open Ara225 opened this issue 1 year ago • 1 comments

Jay made a spreadsheet for the NW code reviews. The exact same concept wouldn't work for us but the idea of tracking stuff on a spreadsheet could work. we could either have people adding the links to the sheets directly or through agoogle form

The problem is giving feedback:

  • volenteers could review them directly on the commits on Github(this is annoying on a number of levels and most devs don't know how to do this so friction)
  • Volenteers could @ them in a Google sheets comment
  • Volenteers could email them (I imagine this solution wouold make Sally sad because GPDR though)

None of these seem like good ideas. Of course something in the dashboard would be ideal - maybe we could make the code review directly part of the process, using comments to provide the code review. Maybe that wouldn;t even need any changes

Ara225 avatar Sep 20 '24 19:09 Ara225

@Ara225 I think this is worth bringing up in the Retro on Monday

AmyCYF avatar Oct 04 '24 17:10 AmyCYF

Hi @kfklein15, We have discussed this during our Friday meeting and we were wondering if we can send this to the Dev team as a feature request.

ZacheeNiyokwizera avatar Nov 22 '24 18:11 ZacheeNiyokwizera

I think it might make more sense to remove the code review step. What do you think @cjyuan ?

SallyMcGrath avatar Dec 03 '24 16:12 SallyMcGrath

@SallyMcGrath, I support removing the code review step.

We can use A/C to let both participants and volunteers know exactly what to expect. For example, to ensure there is no error in the HTML/CSS code with the help of a validator. This way, volunteers can just check if participant's webpage meets the A/C and give feedbacks accordingly on Dashboard (which is kind like a code review).

Doing so can save volunteers a lot of time from tracking code review requests on Slack.

cjyuan avatar Dec 03 '24 17:12 cjyuan

We agreed at the meeting that step 4 will die because of the Scrimba replacement. Are we happy to close this ticket?

Ara225 avatar Dec 10 '24 15:12 Ara225

I think we will be replacing (CYF blocks) by a modified version of step 4. In any case, there won't be a separate reviewing step on Slack. So we can close this ticket.

cjyuan avatar Dec 10 '24 16:12 cjyuan