Wrap BrxBim classes
@CEXT-Dan hope you're well. Could use functionality to import 1) IFC, 2) classify entities (for example by layer name) and 3) export to IFC. I believe it's all BCAD verticals. I am aware that there may be other priorities. Whenever you find the time I would be grateful to be able to script anything.
- https://help.bricsys.com/en-us/document/command-reference/i/import-command?version=V24&id=165079082118
- https://help.bricsys.com/en-us/document/bricscad-bim/building-data/bim-classify?version=V24&id=165079158884
- https://help.bricsys.com/en-us/document/command-reference/i/ifcexport-command?version=V24&id=165079081611
Have in mind that you're about to travel for longer. Wish you safe journey.
Originally posted by @schoeller in https://github.com/CEXT-Dan/PyRx/issues/5#issuecomment-2211708315
In progress, est two-three weeks
Saw that you're back online. Hope you're well. Please signal whenever I becomes reasonable to attempt scripting BRX24.2.03.0\samples\brxBimSample\BimIfcImport.cpp
I’m going to defer this until V25 is released, reason is, there appears API changes between beta versions. I find myself having to redo stuff.
Saw that you're back online. Hope you're well. Please signal whenever I becomes reasonable to attempt scripting
BRX24.2.03.0\samples\brxBimSample\BimIfcImport.cpp
Hi, do you have any sample data I can use to test? I'll try to push hard on this next week. Admittedly, this wrap is hard for me, I've never worked with BIM.
Saw that you're back online. Hope you're well. Please signal whenever I becomes reasonable to attempt scripting
BRX24.2.03.0\samples\brxBimSample\BimIfcImport.cppHi, do you have any sample data I can use to test? I'll try to push hard on this next week. Admittedly, this wrap is hard for me, I've never worked with BIM.
Hi as well. I just tried sample data from BuildingSMART. Works as manual import into v24. Hope distraction from vanilla work does not cause too many headaches.
From my current understanding the BCAD BIM (in this case) consists of two parts:
1#Import of geometries into ACIS objects from IFC 2x3 up to 4.1.
2#Classification of existing objects through a defined tag-catalogue.
In a current project it would be a time-saver to mass-convert incoming IFC-files to DWG to assemble a collision model (1#). Second goal would be to sync object classification <-> layer structure.
Best wishes.
Seb
@CEXT-Dan I saw the code snipped from your work. I have tried to load it with the file path correctly set. It messages as follows:
onIfcProduct 94257
<PyBrxBim.IfcImportContext object at 0x00000000030F1F40> False
True
I do not see any objects imported though. I cannot get around figuring out the usage of Bim.IfcImportReactor. Is it already possible to sideload (convert) an IFC to DWG and how would I do that? Best Seb
Hi, it's not ready yet.
I can import the sample from building smart on a local compile. However, I’m having trouble in that onIfcProductImported is never called. It’s not called in the BRX sample either. onIfcProduct is called, however, matrix = context.getLocalPlacement(entity) always returns an identity, This is also the same with the BRX sample. I’m not sure if this is by design or if BRX has issues. I’ll work this week on filling in the gaps for importing, I expect there will be issues
SR 184312 asks for help
I can import the sample from building smart on a local compile. However, I’m having trouble in that onIfcProductImported is never called. It’s not called in the BRX sample either. onIfcProduct is called, however, matrix = context.getLocalPlacement(entity) always returns an identity, This is also the same with the BRX sample. I’m not sure if this is by design or if BRX has issues. I’ll work this week on filling in the gaps for importing, I expect there will be issues
I have seen the following in the SDK as well as samples\brxBimSample\BimIfcImport.cpp. Everything else is out of my league
I had set new guid in https://github.com/CEXT-Dan/PyRx/blob/main/PySamples/PyBrxBim/importTest.py
onStart, onIfcProduct, and beforeCompletion are called correctly. My guess is that onIfcProductImported has lost its “virtual” status due to some internal change. I still have lots of work on other items in BIM while I wait on the SR… I’ll make a release Thursday as a progress build
I had set new guid in https://github.com/CEXT-Dan/PyRx/blob/main/PySamples/PyBrxBim/importTest.py
onStart, onIfcProduct, and beforeCompletion are called correctly. My guess is that onIfcProductImported has lost its “virtual” status due to some internal change. I still have lots of work on other items in BIM while I wait on the SR… I’ll make a release Thursday as a progress build
Sorry to have bothered you with this workload.
Is it somehow possible to fetch properties from Mechanical info (1#) (for example through dump functionality) and copy it into a custom BIM properties set (2#)? Just curious to save us tons of hours.
1#
2#
Not sure about that off the top of my head I noticed the mechanical sample that has access to properties. I know Bricsys has a cool properties class for vanilla BricsCAD, I have not wrapped either yet
Not sure about that off the top of my head I noticed the mechanical sample that has access to properties. I know Bricsys has a cool properties class for vanilla BricsCAD, I have not wrapped either yet
@CEXT-Dan: Thx for the feedback. We will try ourselves with LISP standard tools for the mo. Best of health.
Bricsys was able to reproduce the import reactor issue, I don’t think they will be working on a V24 fix, since V25 is just around the corner. I’ll continue working on Bim wrappers, albeit with a lower priority
Seems Bricsys does not want to support me on this project. Closing until something changes
Advise is requested:
import traceback
from pyrx_imp import Rx, Ge, Gs, Gi, Db, Ap, Ed, Bim
import wx
import os, pathlib
def openIfcSideDrawing(path, opts):
print("\nProcessing {} ".format(path))
db = Db.Database(False, True)
Bim.IfcImportOptions.importIfcFile(db, path, opts)
path = str(path[:-3]) + "dwg"
print(path)
db.saveAs("c://temp/test.dwg")
db.closeInput(True)
def PyRxCmd_doit1():
try:
ifcext = ".ifc".casefold()
opts = Bim.IfcImportOptions()
dlg = wx.DirDialog(None, "Choose input directory","",
wx.DD_DEFAULT_STYLE | wx.DD_DIR_MUST_EXIST)
if dlg.ShowModal() != wx.ID_OK:
print("You Cancelled The Dialog!")
return
for fname in next(os.walk(dlg.GetPath()), (None, None, []))[2]:
ext = pathlib.Path(fname).suffix.casefold()
if ext != ifcext:
continue
fpath = '{}\\{}'.format(dlg.GetPath(),fname)
print(fpath)
openIfcSideDrawing(fpath, opts)
except Exception as err:
traceback.print_exception(err)
leads to
Processing C:\Users\Sebastian Schoeller\Downloads\Ifc\13-02_40-00_IWP.ifc
C:\Users\Sebastian Schoeller\Downloads\Ifc\13-02_40-00_IWP.dwg
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Users\Sebastian Schoeller\Nextcloud\10000-Beruf\02-Software\PyRx\ConvertIfc.py", line 34, in PyRxCmd_doit1
openIfcSideDrawing(fpath, opts)
File "C:\Users\Sebastian Schoeller\Nextcloud\10000-Beruf\02-Software\PyRx\ConvertIfc.py", line 13, in openIfcSideDrawing
db.saveAs("c://temp/test.dwg")
PyDb.ErrorStatusException: Exception!(eFileAccessErr), function saveAs1, Line 2150, File PyDbDatabase.cpp:
this works for me, see my comment also, make sure c:/temp/test.dwg is not opened already
import traceback
from pyrx_imp import Rx, Ge, Gs, Gi, Db, Ap, Ed, Bim
import wx
import os, pathlib
def openIfcSideDrawing(path, opts):
print("\nProcessing {} ".format(path))
# the ctor is going to change because in this case you are creating
# a new drawing which also needs a new document
db = Db.Database(True, False)
Bim.IfcImportOptions.importIfcFile(db, path, opts)
path = str(path[:-3]) + "dwg"
print(path)
db.saveAs("c:/temp/test.dwg")
#not needed, this is for reading exisiting drawings
#db.closeInput(True)
def PyRxCmd_doit1():
try:
ifcext = ".ifc".casefold()
opts = Bim.IfcImportOptions()
dlg = wx.DirDialog(None, "Choose input directory","",
wx.DD_DEFAULT_STYLE | wx.DD_DIR_MUST_EXIST)
if dlg.ShowModal() != wx.ID_OK:
print("You Cancelled The Dialog!")
return
for fname in next(os.walk(dlg.GetPath()), (None, None, []))[2]:
ext = pathlib.Path(fname).suffix.casefold()
if ext != ifcext:
continue
fpath = '{}\\{}'.format(dlg.GetPath(),fname)
print(fpath)
openIfcSideDrawing(fpath, opts)
except Exception as err:
traceback.print_exception(err)
oh! also db.saveAs("c:/temp/test.dwg") is in a loop, so if you have more than one .ICF file if will fail because c:/temp/test.dwg is already there
Thx. Blindfolded. This works for me now:
def openSaveIfcSideDrawing(path, opts):
print("\nProcessing {} ".format(path))
db = Db.Database(True, False)
Bim.IfcImportOptions.importIfcFile(db, path, opts)
path = str(path[:-3]) + "dwg"
db.saveAs(path)
print("\nSaved to {} ".format(path))
db.closeInput(True)
I’m not sure what to do with this task. The import reactor, (which seems like the most important feature? ) does not work in V24 or V25. I think the class layout is mostly done. I’ll reopen this so it can be worked on. Maybe there’s some other important features, I don’t really understand BIM
Started test scripting the sample from BRX25.1.05.0\samples\brxBimSample\BimClassification.cpp. Noticed that Bim.BimStory.setDescription was non-existant. Compared BRX25.1.05.0\inc\BrxSpecific\bim\BuildingElements.h to PyBrxBimObject.h and have openend a pull request for what I thought to be useful with focus on BimStory.
When doing
ourBuilding = Bim.BimBuilding.createNewBuilding(db, "TowerNorth")
ourBuilding.setDescription("the north side tower building")
floor_1 = Bim.BimStory.createNewStory(db, "TowerNorth", "Floor 1")
all nice, but
floor_2 = Bim.BimStory.createStory("second floor", ourBuilding)
throws
floor_2 = Bim.BimStory.createStory("second floor", ourBuilding)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Boost.Python.ArgumentError: Python argument types in
BimStory.createStory(str, BimBuilding)
did not match C++ signature:
createStory(class PyBrxBimStory {lvalue}, class std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> >, class PyBrxBimBuilding)
When trying as per SDK
// assign floors & building to "hull entities"
AcDbObjectId idBuilding;
AcDbObjectIdArray idsForBuilding;
bimRes = ourBuilding.assignedObjects(idsForBuilding, pDb);
if (idsForBuilding.isEmpty())
{
idBuilding = createBoxSolid(100, 35, 20, AcGeVector3d(0,0,10.0), 1);
bimRes = ourBuilding.assignToEntity(idBuilding);
}
in the fashion
db = Db.curDb()
model = Db.BlockTableRecord(Db.curDb().modelSpaceId(), Db.OpenMode.ForRead)
ourBuilding = Bim.BimBuilding.createNewBuilding(db, "TowerNorth")
ourBuilding.setDescription("the north side tower building")
if not ourBuilding.assignedObjects(db):
print("creating building elements")
box = Db.Solid3d()
box.createBox(100.0,35.0,20.0) # createBoxSolid(100, 35, 20, AcGeVector3d(0,0,10.0), 1); add vector
model.upgradeOpen()
model.appendAcDbEntity(box)
ourBuilding.assignToEntity(box.id())
model.downgradeOpen()
I see no properties attached to the solid.
Started test scripting the sample from
BRX25.1.05.0\samples\brxBimSample\BimClassification.cpp. Noticed that Bim.BimStory.setDescription was non-existant. ComparedBRX25.1.05.0\inc\BrxSpecific\bim\BuildingElements.htoPyBrxBimObject.hand have openend a pull request for what I thought to be useful with focus on BimStory.When doing
ourBuilding = Bim.BimBuilding.createNewBuilding(db, "TowerNorth") ourBuilding.setDescription("the north side tower building") floor_1 = Bim.BimStory.createNewStory(db, "TowerNorth", "Floor 1")all nice, but
floor_2 = Bim.BimStory.createStory("second floor", ourBuilding)throws
floor_2 = Bim.BimStory.createStory("second floor", ourBuilding) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Boost.Python.ArgumentError: Python argument types in BimStory.createStory(str, BimBuilding) did not match C++ signature: createStory(class PyBrxBimStory {lvalue}, class std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> >, class PyBrxBimBuilding)
createStory is not static
def PyRxCmd_doit():
try:
db = Db.curDb()
ourBuilding = Bim.BimBuilding.createNewBuilding(db, "TowerNorth")
ourBuilding.setDescription("the north side tower building")
floor_1 = Bim.BimStory.createNewStory(db, "TowerNorth", "Floor 1")
floor_2 = Bim.BimStory()
floor_2.createStory("second floor", ourBuilding)
print(
ourBuilding.description(),
floor_2.getBuilding().description() == ourBuilding.description(),
)
except Exception as err:
traceback.print_exception(err)
if not ourBuilding.assignedObjects(db):
looks like a bug in BricsCAD. the function succeeds;
from pyrx_imp import Rx, Ge, Gs, Gi, Db, Ap, Ed, Bim
import traceback
def PyRxCmd_doit():
try:
db = Db.curDb()
ourBuilding = Bim.BimBuilding.createNewBuilding(db, "TowerNorth")
ourBuilding.setDescription("the north side tower building")
ourBuilding.setName("TowerNorth")
ourBuilding.setLongName("TowerNorth")
if not ourBuilding.assignedObjects(db):
print("creating building elements")
box = Db.Solid3d()
box.createBox(100.0,35.0,20.0)
box.transformBy(Ge.Matrix3d.translation(Ge.Vector3d(0,0,10.0)))
bid = db.addToModelspace(box)
ourBuilding.assignToEntity(bid)
except Exception as err:
traceback.print_exception(err)
BTW, db.addToModelspace is a shortcut for having to deal with model
Comparing BuildingElements.h to PyBrxBimObject.h for PyBrxBimClassification. Have seen that there are some double entries like below
static BimApi::ResultStatus classifyAs(const AcDbObjectId& id, const BimApi::BimElementType objectType);
static BimApi::ResultStatus classifyAs(const AcDbObjectId& id, const AcString& typeName, bool localName = false);
Comparing BuildingElements.h to PyBrxBimObject.h for PyBrxBimClassification. Have seen that there are some double entries like below
static BimApi::ResultStatus classifyAs(const AcDbObjectId& id, const BimApi::BimElementType objectType); static BimApi::ResultStatus classifyAs(const AcDbObjectId& id, const AcString& typeName, bool localName = false);
Unless we know for certain that one method is depreciated, we have to do both, we don’t know if the user will run into a situation where the overload is required
edit: Just to add, of course, you can only do the functions you need to get your project working, maybe leave a TODO comment that the class is incomplete
Have no idea what I am doing. How would this translate in BuildingElements.h?
class BRX_IMPORTEXPORT BimClassification
...
static BimApi::ResultStatus getClassification(AcString& typeName, const AcDbObjectId& id, bool localName = false);
...
Have no idea what I am doing. How would this translate in
BuildingElements.h?class BRX_IMPORTEXPORT BimClassification ... static BimApi::ResultStatus getClassification(AcString& typeName, const AcDbObjectId& id, bool localName = false); ...
it's a hard class, I committed and update,I will finish it when I am back later today