Post analysis node size is disproportionate
I think that the post analysis gene set might not be filtered according to the dataset which is making a much larger set
@veroniquevoisin would like to keep the node size to reflect the size of the post analysis set including the genes that are not in any dataset so the user can see what overlapped and what didn't.
This works fine with a post analysis set that is ~500 but for sets that contained 1000s of genes it might not be.
Maybe a feature to hide genes not in dataset would be helpful.
It looks like in EM2 the size of a signature gene set node is constant (in fact the gene set size attribute is blank).
How should it work in EM3? Options:
- Constant size like EM2
- Size of signature set
- Size of signature set after filtering out genes not in the base EM
I al[image: Inline image 1]ways increase thenode size to 50 for the PA nodes
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Mike Kucera [email protected] wrote:
It looks like in EM2 the size of a signature gene set node is constant (in fact the gene set size attribute is blank).
How should it work in EM3? Options:
- Constant size like EM2
- Size of signature set
- Size of signature set after filtering out genes not in the base EM
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/BaderLab/EnrichmentMapApp/issues/187#issuecomment-305896416, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHODy-vm-MHO7ACWSJa5zupo3DG4X43oks5sAGtJgaJpZM4NViqd .
-- Veronique Voisin, PhD
Pathway and Network Analyses for OICR Cancer Stem Cell Research Terrence Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomedical Research, University of Toronto, 160 College Street, Toronto, M5S3E1. https://oicr.on.ca/oicr-programs-and-platforms/innovation-programs/cancer-stem-cells/resources https://oicr.on.ca/oicr-programs-and-platforms/innovation-programs/cancer-stem-cells/resources http://baderlab.org/CSCPathwayAnalysisService http://baderlab.org