Pass SVF data directly in as String or Array Bugger

[MrBlenny]

Is it possible to directly pass in svf data as a string or array buffer (instead of setting document to a url)?

For example:

    http({
      url: 'http://developer-autodesk.github.io/translated-models/shaver/0.svf',
      responseType: 'arraybuffer'
    }).then(response => {
      const viewer = new Autodesk.Viewing.Private.GuiViewer3D(this.refs.cadCanvas);
      console.log(response.data);
      const options = {
        'env' : 'Local',
        'document' : response.data
      };
      Autodesk.Viewing.Initializer(options, function() {
        viewer.start(options.document, options);
      });
    })

Unfortunately I could not find any documentation on options.env = 'Local' here

[shiya]

The options.env = 'Local' is not officially supported therefore no documentation. You should pass in the url as options.document

[MrBlenny]

So there is no way to pass in the data directly? Passing a url is not really an option in my use case 😢

Are there any other workarounds? Maybe something like a blob-url would work?

[shiya]

You can also download the entire translated file and reference the entry .svf like this sample.

[MrBlenny]

I cannot reference a local file or a url in my application.

I was hoping I could use a blob url (as follows)

    http({
      url: 'http://developer-autodesk.github.io/translated-models/shaver/0.svf',
      responseType: 'blob'
    }).then(response => {
      const viewer = new Autodesk.Viewing.Private.GuiViewer3D(this.refs.cadCanvas);
      const blobUrl = URL.createObjectURL(response.data);
      const options = {
        'env' : 'Local',
        'document' : blobUrl
      };
      Autodesk.Viewing.Initializer(options, function() {
        viewer.start(options.document, options);
      });
    })

Unfortunately, this throws an error.

Uncaught TypeError: l is not a constructor
e.loadModel	@	viewer3D.min.js?v=v2.10:27
a.loadModel	@	viewer3D.min.js?v=v2.10:29
e.start	@	viewer3D.min.js?v=v2.10:27
(anonymous function)	@	AutodeskLocalViewer.jsx?9ecd:18

I suppose I will have to modify the source code to allow the passing in of data directly if it is not already possible.

[shiya]

Would you share with us your solution when you do? Honestly don't think we've thought of making it possible to not pass in an url.